.
Feedback

UConn Experts Tackle Implications of Election

Hours after Barack Obama won a second term as president of the United States, a panel of UConn experts convened to analyze what the results of the vote will mean for the country.

This article was originally published on the UConn Today website on Nov. 7, 2012.

By: Tom Breen

In a panel moderated by Professor Jeremy Pressman, professors Charles Venator, Ronald Schurin, Shayla Nunnally, Vincent Moscardelli, and Stephen Dyson tackled everything from the changing demographics of the American electorate to the critical role that individual personalities play in major elections.

The scholars also discussed the results of Connecticut’s closely-watched race for an open U.S. Senate seat, in which Rep. Chris Murphy defeated former professional wrestling executive Linda McMahon, helping the Democrats maintain control of the chamber.

Overall, though, the professors agreed that while the election, like all elections, will have far-reaching effects, it mostly upheld the political status quo, with Obama in the White House, and a Congress divided between a Republican-controlled House of Representatives and a narrowly-held Democratic Senate.

“Even though we spend a lot of time talking about change, this election reveals the system’s natural tendency toward stability,” said Moscardelli, noting that roughly nine of 10 seats in the House didn’t change hands.

Schurin said part of the reason for this is the relatively static presidential voting habits of American states. The vast majority of states – and, therefore, their electoral votes – are essentially decided for either Democrats or Republicans long before Election Day, leaving a handful of swing states as the only real contested ground for campaigns.

“While we are undergoing vast demographic change in this country, we’re in a situation of relative geographic stability and have been for a generation,” Schurin said.

That demographic change was most evident in the coalition that elected Obama, Venator said. Obama won thanks to votes from Latinos, blacks, women, and young people, with the election showing in particular the growing clout of Latino voters.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney only won about 27 percent of the Latino vote, Venator said, about 6 percent to 8 percent worse than had been expected, and 4 percent below Sen. John McCain’s showing four years ago.

“We’re seeing more of a move to the Democratic Party,” Venator said, noting that Latinos make up significant portions of the population in swing states like Colorado, Nevada, and Florida, all of which were won by Obama.

That’s going to have to become a focus for the Republican Party if it wants to remain competitive in future presidential elections, Nunnally said, or risk seeing its base comprised of an ever-shrinking part of the population.

“The Republican Party really needs to make efforts to become attractive to these groups who primarily identify as Democrats right now,” she said.

But while demographics and geography and other larger factors played a significant role in the election, Dyson argued that individual personalities are still crucially important for understanding campaigns, especially in races as close as this one.

“With a closely divided country, seemingly little things – even a single decision by a single individual – can have macro-political implications,” Dyson said, giving as an example Obama’s decision early in his term to bail out the struggling auto industry.

Although unpopular at the time, exit polls last night showed that 60 percent of voters in Ohio – an auto industry center – approved of the decision, and that 75 percent of those voters supported Obama.

Personality and demographics both played a decisive role in the Connecticut Senate race, the scholars said, in which McMahon, despite spending $44 million of her own money on the campaign just two years after spending $50 million in another unsuccessful Senate bid, was handily defeated by Murphy.

“Linda McMahon had an obvious problem going into both races, and that was how she made her money,” Schurin said, referring to criticism of World Wrestling Entertainment over violent or sexually suggestive programming.

Moscardelli said a major factor in the race was the significant gender gap, with Murphy winning women’s votes by a double-digit margin.

“She needed women,” he said of McMahon, adding that her efforts to appeal to those voters never quite succeeded. “Even as she was picking up ground among women in terms of electability, it never translated into votes.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mansfield-Storrs Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
left to right: Meredith Prunty, Addison LaFountain, Adam Teper, Richard Meehan, Paisley Scott Dickey
Denise Tripp May 14, 2013 at 03:19 pm
be sure to watch the trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnWL3Z8TQYI <br/><br/>
Spiff April 2, 2013 at 09:01 pm
No, North Korea isn't making me nervous. They're just a bunch of big mouthed small minded windRead More bags. What really makes me nervous are the politicians currently in power around here, namely Dan Malloy and Barack Obama. They make me plenty more nervous than Kim Jong Un...
Jim April 2, 2013 at 08:16 pm
You cant blame this on bad parenting Dean, just ask any parent.
Jim April 2, 2013 at 08:14 pm
I wonder what will happen to these kids 20 years from now after taking these drugs.
Ben Rodriguez April 2, 2013 at 02:50 pm
ADHD is a real disorder but is way over-diagnosed. When a boy isn't engaged (bored, not challenged),Read More he's slapped with a label. Sometimes drugs are appropriate, other times it could mean that he needs to move up a grade level or be stimulated in another way. But other times its just covering problems up. I'd like to know what other countries do that diagnose ADHD.
K March 30, 2013 at 01:55 pm
Thank you, Julie Menard for everything you do. You are an amazing person and we are blessed to haveRead More you in our lives. Michael, Krista and Maddie
Janice Hurd March 29, 2013 at 09:16 pm
Thank You! and you as well! :)
aleta March 29, 2013 at 05:06 pm
Why not make them public! The whole public has been on this since begining. We mourned and have hadRead More tribute after tribute. We got to see the faces of the victims,why can't we see the evidence,life and witnesses of a man who did such a hienous act.. I don't get it.
Rebecca 'Flora' D'Angelo March 28, 2013 at 01:13 am
I don't know if this comment was supposed to be serious or not.....but if it is, here's why thatRead More should never happen: http://www.gaelick.com/2011/06/my-marriage-is-equal/16012/
John Pickoff March 27, 2013 at 03:56 pm
Why not name Marriage between people of the same sex "Gayrriage" and make them as valid asRead More marriage. It may keep more people happy.
Lord King Bloo March 27, 2013 at 03:51 pm
And there is the great thing about the Internet. I came here (just found Patch the other day) forRead More some civil discussion about local events with people in my community and not one post later it devolves to, essentially, name calling by anonymous users. It’s the most perfect constant in the universe. Anyway, no, 17 years is not that long in the grand scheme of things, but this is not the 1950’s. And I don’t see why in this case it’s Bill Clinton’s values. He signed the law, but I fail to see how that effects the current discussion. It would seem to be the values of the country as whole that are changing.
Anthony March 26, 2013 at 01:37 pm
Puke
Kathie March 26, 2013 at 12:03 pm
move somewhere warm, then I would help the homeless and hungry, and also amimal shelters